(Back up video on Bitchute & YouTube )
This decision has raised concerns among critics who see it as part of a broader trend of increasing Islamic influence in Western institutions. Some point to longstanding efforts by groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood to promote ideologies that conflict with Western values, often referring to this strategy as “soft jihad” or “Islamification.”
They argue that this process is gradual and strategic, affecting local and national governments one step at a time. Critics of this trend view it as incompatible with the foundational principles of the United States, which was built on Judeo-Christian values. Some contend that the fundamental tenets of Islam are at odds with the U.S. Constitution, raising questions about how religious beliefs and civic duties can coexist in this context.
Additionally, the influx of asylum seekers from predominantly Muslim countries has sparked debate about cultural integration and the true intentions behind these migration movements. Some refer to this as Hijrah, a religiously motivated expansion aimed at establishing Sharia law once a majority is achieved. Critics argue that support for these movements may unintentionally advance agendas that could undermine Western freedoms and traditions.
For further insights, consider watching this interview with Alex Newman of The Liberty Sentinel.
